• Frostbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Norway mentiones how the Olaf Haraldson died the “martyr” death in 1030 while trying to make Norway christian. The entire second verse is about the early medieval kings. The stanza in the second verse reads something like this: “…On the country Olav painted the cross with his blood”

    • Sasquatch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      3rd stanza. In school I think we never went beyond the first stanza.

      Their blood has wash’d out their foul footstep’s pollution

      metal asf

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I legitimately thought they were bullshiting until I went and looked it up. In my 40-some years on planet earth, I have never heard anyone sing the song beyond the first stanza. The song having multiple stanzas has never even been brought up.

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    one of the iterations of Ukraine’s national anthem lyrics from early 20th century had blood mentioned in the context of dark past history of wars and occupation and how our people persist in spite of everything. that bit wasn’t in the original poem and its musical adaptation which was about glorious past and wishful bright future. then there was late 20th iteration that replaced that bit with a bloody battle going from the river San to river Don. San and Don rivers were previously mentioned as abstract furthest points of slavic people agglomeration. That version also mentions river Dnipro in a different part and calls it Granpa Dnipro.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The state flag of Virginia has boobs on it, also an active call for violence. Not the same, but its in the spirit of the post.

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The Austrian anthem doesn’t mention blood anywhere. It mentions “heart”, as in “in the heart of Europe”

  • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I am much disappoint. Looking it up, I find that Brazil has four songs: the national anthem, the anthem of the republic, the flag anthem, and the anthem of independence. None of them mention boobs, and one of them does mention blood.

    • EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You mean my unsourced internet meme was misleading, uninformed, or otherwise inaccurate? The idea of it! Next you’ll tell me not to form an opinion on headlines alone!

      • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That’s not boobs. Every translation that I found had it as “bosom” in English, referring to the chest area. I mean, maybe some people have liberty in their tiddies, but that seems unusual.

          • JayDee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It’s used quite often to mean chest. It’s a fill in for saying “breast”, which is usually meaning “inside one’s chest, near to their heart”.

            There’s a quote attributed to Albert Einstein though I found no source to which is “Anger dwells only in the bosom of fools”, which shows this application.

            Shakespear also has Isabella say in Measure for Measure, act 2 scene 2 “Go to your bosom: knock there, and ask your heart what it doth know.”, which seems most accurately to be describing the chest more vaguely.

            I think that these two show how ‘in [one’s] bosom’ often poetically means 'near [one’s] heart", or ‘close to [one’s] chest’. The chest isn’t the point of sentence, it’s more a reference point for describing the actual subject location.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yeah it seems like it began meaning chest, became a polite way of saying boobs, and eventually the latter edged out the former. Mind you this is in English and the line in question is Portuguese so maybe arguing English semantics isn’t helping us get close to the truth.

              If anyone here speaks Portuguese I’d love to hear if that word has any of these implications in Portuguese.

          • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            because the common use of it nowadays means “breasts”, the lyrics were written over a hundred years ago, that does not mean that that was the most common usage at the time or the intended one

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            They’re not contrarian, bosom can refer to breasts but that’s not the only definition. I’m pretty sure it’s not even the primary definition for the majority of the word’s existence.

            I don’t really want to link a bible site but take your pick and search for the word. 50+ references and it rarely meant boobs. It meant…the area of hugging. How could a man put his hands between his tits? Cradling a child is holding it in your bosom. A baby doesn’t suck milk from bosoms.

            Bosom meant the chest area even if it generally only used to mean breasts nowadays.

            • kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              How could a man put his hands between his tits?

              Well, if he is very fat, has gynecomastia, or has not gotten top surgery yet, so technically…

            • soupcon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              You might read it that way, but it doesn’t make the other reading wrong the way that user SwingingTheLamp was suggesting.

              • deus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                10 hours ago

                No, reading it in that way is wrong. The lyrics are talking about the land, the country. Not a person. In context it can only mean heart or core, not breast.

        • ElectricVocalist@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The translation is wrong. I don’t know where that anthem comes but in french, sein means core. In its “sein” means at its core, deeply rooted

          • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Thailand’s national anthem is smuttier, then, since it talks about holding Thai people in boobs, not just an abstract concept like liberty!

  • Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The only blood in the Australian national anthem is the blood dripping from my ears after listening to it

    • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I heard that we were able to identify spies because of this. Apparently they were taught the full anthem whereas Americans do not recite the full one. It’s funny to imagine these spies thinking they’re absolutely killing it and the Americans looking at each other like “we gotta get rid of them, huh”.

      • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If you think about it, it ends in a question.

        O say, does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave,
        O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

        Second stanza answers it.

        On the shore dimly seen through the mists of the deep
        Where the foe’s haughty host in dread silence reposes
        What is that which the breeze o’er the towering steep
        As it fitfully blows half conceals, half discloses?
        Now it catches the gleam of the morning’s first beam,
        In full glory reflected now shines on the stream,
        ‘Tis the Star-Spangled Banner, O long may it wave,
        O’er the land of the free, and the home of the brave!

      • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        21 hours ago

        No refuge could save the hireling and slave From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave

        The fuck?

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          This verse is referring to the british, not menial laborers or chattel slaves. “Hirelings” was (is?) an insulting term to describe a mercenary, and the implication is that they are either brigands who are only in it for a pittance wage, rubes who do it because of a loyalty to the monarchy and/or impressed soldiers of the british (a practice with many parallels to chattel slavery, for what that’s worth). A modern version might call them “sheep” with a similar implication.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            And it’s important to add, one of the cassi belli for the war of 1812 was the british impressment of sailors on American vessels, including American citizens.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              The song was written about the war of 1812, not the revolutionary war.

              As the wikipedia article points out, during the revolutionary war most of the black Patriots were recruited from the north already as free men of color and were at the time lionized for their actions (albeit in predictably racist terms) - and abolition would take over the north quite quickly afterwards (most having some form of abolition well before 1800). The first continental congress also banned the import of slaves in 1774 (though abolitionists cheered it at the time and rightly so, it should be said that this was primairly a method of applying economic pressure to the british), and would set up the civil war by doing so.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      USA USA USA! But for real, we started the war, yes, but we had reasonable cassus belli (embargoing our trade with france and kidnapping our seamen into the british navy) and the poem is about a defensive battle.

      I still think our national anthem should be a secularized version of the battle hymn of the republic.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      The only one that explicitly mentions them, yep. It’s a recounting of the british attack on a US fort during the war of 1812, which was attacked by, among other things, british bomb ships (mortar carriers). The actual bombs being referenced would be called shells in the modern era. Interestingly many others refer to guns and cannons and incoming fire and etc. as well; China’s makes explicit reference to being shelled (tho as I have had it explained, it’s also a bit of quite clever wordplay: 冒着敌人的炮火,前进 can mean both “withstand their (physical) guns/cannons” and “stand up in the face of their (metaphorical) aggression”)

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Which is weird, since it was written in 1814, and I can’t think of any bombs that burst in the air back then other than fireworks. Were they shooting fireworks in a battle?

  • Tyra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Neither the Austrian nor the German national anthem mention blood?

    • drolex@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think they do in the secret stanzas where they list all the types of sausages

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      They both at mention a heart which… might be why they were included? But I think this map may just be AI or recaptioned from something else because thats a bit of a stretch to call blood.

      edit: USA, China & mexico both overtly mention blood though… Maybe it really is the heart thing? Though if that were true then Canada should be on there too. Idkwtf

      edit 2: and the Brazilian anthem is disappointing given the way it’s brought up in the OP; it’s not a crass use of it like “boob” but very much akin to “my heart beat in my breast” or “nurtured by your bosom”. By that metric a ton of other countries also feature tiddy anthems.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If thats a question, yes, germany does not use the first two verses of the national anthem any more. The nazis made those uncomfortable.

      • wieson@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The first two stanzas of “the song of the Germans” doesn’t mention it either I think.
        The third stanza (which is the national anthem in its entirety) is more aspirational than a look back on history.
        “Unity and Justice and Freedom… Let’s strive for that… May it blossom in the light of this happiness” and so on.

        Austria is painted red tho.

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        @tyra@lemmy.ml

        Yet, neither of the 3 verses of the Deutschlandlied mentions blood.
        The first mentions only geographic terms (“von der Maas bis an die Memel, von der Etsch bis an den Belt”) and brotherly connection for protection and defence.
        The second verse mentions women, loyality, wine and singing.
        Only the third verse, on unity, right and freedom, is considered the national anthem of the Federal Republic.

        Edit: Austria is painted in red on the map despite their “Bundeshymne” (federal hymn) doesn’t contain the word “Blut” (‘blood’).