A bigot is hateful and intolerant, whilst I’m accepting, empathetic and tolerant.
Nah, you’re just more clever with how you go about being hateful and intolerant than a typical MAGAt. In intent and probable outcome you’re no different from them.
Yes, the person who wants nothing bad to happen with transgender people and is always willing to “play along” for their sake is the same as a typical MAGAt, in both intent and outcome. 🙄
I cannot agree with the rationalisations because I’m clear minded and have no stakes in it
(wrt trans people).
but what a “misnomer”, you can’t be both any subset of Roman Catholic and offshoot and monotheistic by definition.
I’m strict with my beliefs and I speak against falsehoods and immorality
Yo they’re a religous nut moral crusader who flat refuses to acknowledge other people’s beliefs, a transphobe and an /r9k/ trog. Dude’s posting photos of his pepe plush like… I know your impulse here is to defend them because I called them out on the Russia stuff, but you should really let this one go - if you defend this chud people are gonna bring it out as evidence of your own transphobia all the time.
Idk what your problem is overall with anything I’ve posted but I hope you let it go. And no, I acknowledge people’s beliefs (I’m just willing to discuss them and flat out deny them, like basically anyone not religious here with a hateboner for it), I’m not a transphobe (I just disagree with some takes regarding transgenderism, doesn’t mean I wish bad things for them or want violence/hatred towards them), and people can be wrong and emotional if they can’t help it, I’ll just have to handle it, I guess.
Your cringe definition of "I can’t be a bigot / transphobe because I’m not hateful or wish violence" is very convenient for you, but unfortunately you’ve just made it up so you don’t have to face the fact that you definitionally are a bigot.
Bigot (noun): a narrow-minded person who obstinately adheres to their own opinions and prejudices, especially: one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership
I’ve been incredibly clear about what my problem is with what you’ve posted here , what you represent and the disgustingly ignorant and supremacist things you say on this site (fascist bootlicking, evangelism, rampant intolerance, transphobia, the weird racial thing you seem to have going on, etc.) - if you can’t understand, that’s entirely the fault of what appears to be the smugly wilful high-handed ignorance you delight in inflicting on other people.
You failed to include the following from the Merriam Webster definition “especially : one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership”. That’s cheeky but convenient, and I know you’re all about convenience. But I’m not narrow minded nor prejudiced (I’m not the one attacking a person for wrongly attributed characteristics after all, lol), I’m just clear-headed and not wishy-washy. Should I accept that the moon is made out of cheese because many people feel strongly that way? I don’t dislike or hate these people (that’s something done on a person to person basis) nor do I hold ill will towards them because of their ideas regarding transgenderism, but I cannot agree as long as it doesn’t make sense and to condemn me for not doing so is plainly wrong, both morally and intellectually.
And I still don’t understand what weird racial thing I have going on, that’s a new one, lol, but you can attach yourself to that like a remora if it validates your hatred and bad faith convo, I guess. But okay, miss/mister Warlock, whatever keeps you sane and doesn’t endanger your “ideology”. I hope you can let it go or just, idk, block me for your peace of mind. If not, I’ll still judge every one of your posts individually and hopefully we’ll have more uhhh polite conversation in the future. 👋
You failed to include the following from the Merriam Webster definition
… mhmm. I edited that in 20 seconds after I posted the comment, the formatting was wrong on the initial posting. You managed to load the maybe fifteen second window where that wasn’t visible - amazing.
Good for that, and as you can see I don’t fit the definition. I’m cordial and certainly not hateful regardless of whether I agree with people or not. Even with you who have come with nothing but anger and accusations. 🤷♂️
Dude, I’ve already explained that this is a you problem - I’ve got better things to do than listen to a bigot try and “well achktually” their bigotry. Gonna be real, “polite” transphobia is still transphobia, and (clearly) nobody here is falling for that tired 4chan “Oh I’m just polite and you’re being so rude so clearly I’m right” shtick. Go back to 4chan please, you clearly haven’t moved on from that stunted little cesspit.
Nah, you’re just more clever with how you go about being hateful and intolerant than a typical MAGAt. In intent and probable outcome you’re no different from them.
Yes, the person who wants nothing bad to happen with transgender people and is always willing to “play along” for their sake is the same as a typical MAGAt, in both intent and outcome. 🙄
What have they said that’s hateful or intolerant?
From their comments in this thread:
(wrt trans people).
Yo they’re a religous nut moral crusader who flat refuses to acknowledge other people’s beliefs, a transphobe and an /r9k/ trog. Dude’s posting photos of his pepe plush like… I know your impulse here is to defend them because I called them out on the Russia stuff, but you should really let this one go - if you defend this chud people are gonna bring it out as evidence of your own transphobia all the time.
Idk what your problem is overall with anything I’ve posted but I hope you let it go. And no, I acknowledge people’s beliefs (I’m just willing to discuss them and flat out deny them, like basically anyone not religious here with a hateboner for it), I’m not a transphobe (I just disagree with some takes regarding transgenderism, doesn’t mean I wish bad things for them or want violence/hatred towards them), and people can be wrong and emotional if they can’t help it, I’ll just have to handle it, I guess.
Your cringe definition of "I can’t be a bigot / transphobe because I’m not hateful or wish violence" is very convenient for you, but unfortunately you’ve just made it up so you don’t have to face the fact that you definitionally are a bigot.
I’ve been incredibly clear about what my problem is with what you’ve posted here , what you represent and the disgustingly ignorant and supremacist things you say on this site (fascist bootlicking, evangelism, rampant intolerance, transphobia, the weird racial thing you seem to have going on, etc.) - if you can’t understand, that’s entirely the fault of what appears to be the smugly wilful high-handed ignorance you delight in inflicting on other people.
You failed to include the following from the Merriam Webster definition “especially : one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership”. That’s cheeky but convenient, and I know you’re all about convenience. But I’m not narrow minded nor prejudiced (I’m not the one attacking a person for wrongly attributed characteristics after all, lol), I’m just clear-headed and not wishy-washy. Should I accept that the moon is made out of cheese because many people feel strongly that way? I don’t dislike or hate these people (that’s something done on a person to person basis) nor do I hold ill will towards them because of their ideas regarding transgenderism, but I cannot agree as long as it doesn’t make sense and to condemn me for not doing so is plainly wrong, both morally and intellectually.
And I still don’t understand what weird racial thing I have going on, that’s a new one, lol, but you can attach yourself to that like a remora if it validates your hatred and bad faith convo, I guess. But okay, miss/mister Warlock, whatever keeps you sane and doesn’t endanger your “ideology”. I hope you can let it go or just, idk, block me for your peace of mind. If not, I’ll still judge every one of your posts individually and hopefully we’ll have more uhhh polite conversation in the future. 👋
… mhmm. I edited that in 20 seconds after I posted the comment, the formatting was wrong on the initial posting. You managed to load the maybe fifteen second window where that wasn’t visible - amazing.
Good for that, and as you can see I don’t fit the definition. I’m cordial and certainly not hateful regardless of whether I agree with people or not. Even with you who have come with nothing but anger and accusations. 🤷♂️
Take care, Warlock.
Dude, I’ve already explained that this is a you problem - I’ve got better things to do than listen to a bigot try and “well achktually” their bigotry. Gonna be real, “polite” transphobia is still transphobia, and (clearly) nobody here is falling for that tired 4chan “Oh I’m just polite and you’re being so rude so clearly I’m right” shtick. Go back to 4chan please, you clearly haven’t moved on from that stunted little cesspit.
Not defending anyone, was just too lazy to check their history. Thanks for engaging!
Cheers!