Your cringe definition of "I can’t be a bigot / transphobe because I’m not hateful or wish violence" is very convenient for you, but unfortunately you’ve just made it up so you don’t have to face the fact that you definitionally are a bigot.
Bigot (noun): a narrow-minded person who obstinately adheres to their own opinions and prejudices, especially: one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership
I’ve been incredibly clear about what my problem is with what you’ve posted here , what you represent and the disgustingly ignorant and supremacist things you say on this site (fascist bootlicking, evangelism, rampant intolerance, transphobia, the weird racial thing you seem to have going on, etc.) - if you can’t understand, that’s entirely the fault of what appears to be the smugly wilful high-handed ignorance you delight in inflicting on other people.
You failed to include the following from the Merriam Webster definition “especially : one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership”. That’s cheeky but convenient, and I know you’re all about convenience. But I’m not narrow minded nor prejudiced (I’m not the one attacking a person for wrongly attributed characteristics after all, lol), I’m just clear-headed and not wishy-washy. Should I accept that the moon is made out of cheese because many people feel strongly that way? I don’t dislike or hate these people (that’s something done on a person to person basis) nor do I hold ill will towards them because of their ideas regarding transgenderism, but I cannot agree as long as it doesn’t make sense and to condemn me for not doing so is plainly wrong, both morally and intellectually.
And I still don’t understand what weird racial thing I have going on, that’s a new one, lol, but you can attach yourself to that like a remora if it validates your hatred and bad faith convo, I guess. But okay, miss/mister Warlock, whatever keeps you sane and doesn’t endanger your “ideology”. I hope you can let it go or just, idk, block me for your peace of mind. If not, I’ll still judge every one of your posts individually and hopefully we’ll have more uhhh polite conversation in the future. 👋
You failed to include the following from the Merriam Webster definition
… mhmm. I edited that in 20 seconds after I posted the comment, the formatting was wrong on the initial posting. You managed to load the maybe fifteen second window where that wasn’t visible - amazing.
Good for that, and as you can see I don’t fit the definition. I’m cordial and certainly not hateful regardless of whether I agree with people or not. Even with you who have come with nothing but anger and accusations. 🤷♂️
Dude, I’ve already explained that this is a you problem - I’ve got better things to do than listen to a bigot try and “well achktually” their bigotry. Gonna be real, “polite” transphobia is still transphobia, and (clearly) nobody here is falling for that tired 4chan “Oh I’m just polite and you’re being so rude so clearly I’m right” shtick. Go back to 4chan please, you clearly haven’t moved on from that stunted little cesspit.
Aaaand there’s the 4chan smug “disgusting things said in a polite tone mean I’m a good person” routine again. Man, you really haven’t left 4chan behind have you.
I didn’t say anything disgusting, you’re just emotional and blindly hateful. I appreciate what seems to be “righteous anger”, you’re just confused about the target so I’m handling you as well as I can. And I am polite because it’s the right thing to do, idk how that’s a 4chan thing when it used to be the rudest, most inflammatory place ever but sure (and if that’s somehow true today, you should learn from their example and be more cordial, lol).
1: Transphobia is disgusting, and you are saying openly transphobic things, ergo…
2: I was wondering when you were going to get around to trying to justify your horrendous behavior by casting my own as equal-to-or-worse. Keep going, I’ve almost got 4chan debate bingo.
Your cringe definition of "I can’t be a bigot / transphobe because I’m not hateful or wish violence" is very convenient for you, but unfortunately you’ve just made it up so you don’t have to face the fact that you definitionally are a bigot.
I’ve been incredibly clear about what my problem is with what you’ve posted here , what you represent and the disgustingly ignorant and supremacist things you say on this site (fascist bootlicking, evangelism, rampant intolerance, transphobia, the weird racial thing you seem to have going on, etc.) - if you can’t understand, that’s entirely the fault of what appears to be the smugly wilful high-handed ignorance you delight in inflicting on other people.
You failed to include the following from the Merriam Webster definition “especially : one who strongly and unfairly dislikes or feels hatred toward others based on their group membership”. That’s cheeky but convenient, and I know you’re all about convenience. But I’m not narrow minded nor prejudiced (I’m not the one attacking a person for wrongly attributed characteristics after all, lol), I’m just clear-headed and not wishy-washy. Should I accept that the moon is made out of cheese because many people feel strongly that way? I don’t dislike or hate these people (that’s something done on a person to person basis) nor do I hold ill will towards them because of their ideas regarding transgenderism, but I cannot agree as long as it doesn’t make sense and to condemn me for not doing so is plainly wrong, both morally and intellectually.
And I still don’t understand what weird racial thing I have going on, that’s a new one, lol, but you can attach yourself to that like a remora if it validates your hatred and bad faith convo, I guess. But okay, miss/mister Warlock, whatever keeps you sane and doesn’t endanger your “ideology”. I hope you can let it go or just, idk, block me for your peace of mind. If not, I’ll still judge every one of your posts individually and hopefully we’ll have more uhhh polite conversation in the future. 👋
… mhmm. I edited that in 20 seconds after I posted the comment, the formatting was wrong on the initial posting. You managed to load the maybe fifteen second window where that wasn’t visible - amazing.
Good for that, and as you can see I don’t fit the definition. I’m cordial and certainly not hateful regardless of whether I agree with people or not. Even with you who have come with nothing but anger and accusations. 🤷♂️
Take care, Warlock.
Dude, I’ve already explained that this is a you problem - I’ve got better things to do than listen to a bigot try and “well achktually” their bigotry. Gonna be real, “polite” transphobia is still transphobia, and (clearly) nobody here is falling for that tired 4chan “Oh I’m just polite and you’re being so rude so clearly I’m right” shtick. Go back to 4chan please, you clearly haven’t moved on from that stunted little cesspit.
Okay okay, whatever helps you sleep at night. Take care.
Aaaand there’s the 4chan smug “disgusting things said in a polite tone mean I’m a good person” routine again. Man, you really haven’t left 4chan behind have you.
I didn’t say anything disgusting, you’re just emotional and blindly hateful. I appreciate what seems to be “righteous anger”, you’re just confused about the target so I’m handling you as well as I can. And I am polite because it’s the right thing to do, idk how that’s a 4chan thing when it used to be the rudest, most inflammatory place ever but sure (and if that’s somehow true today, you should learn from their example and be more cordial, lol).
1: Transphobia is disgusting, and you are saying openly transphobic things, ergo…
2: I was wondering when you were going to get around to trying to justify your horrendous behavior by casting my own as equal-to-or-worse. Keep going, I’ve almost got 4chan debate bingo.