Omarchy should not matter. But sadly it does. As a power grab.

If you don’t know what Omarchy is here’s the short summary. David Heinemeier Hansson, creator of RubyOnRails, owner of a software business and millionaire, decided a few months ago to go all in on Linux and – because that’s just his MO – thought that turning his setup into a project made sense. Omarchy is just that: A pretty standard Arch Linux distribution with a handful of configuration files, that Heinemeier Hansson (or DHH as he is often called) wrote, or vibed or whatever. There is nothing wrong with this, custom, opinionated special purpose distributions have been part of the Linux culture for a long time and provide a lot of value and experimentation that sometimes even flows back to the original project. In a way Ubuntu Linux is just that to the basis Debian.

There’s also nothing wrong in more opinionated software – quite the opposite. I do think that RubyOnRails and similar frameworks gained traction especially because they do have a clear idea of how they see the respective problem domain. There’s even the statement “There should be one – and preferably only one – obvious way to do it” in the Zen of Python. Having a strong point of view is not a bad thing in software or in general. The problem is the kind of points of view DHH has.

I don’t want to go into all the gritty details here, Brennan Kenneth Brown did a great job with their article “Normalized Fascism in Open Source: $12 Million Given to DHH“, but here’s the short version. DHH is a racist and a fascist. He recently wrote articles on how there are [Content Warning: massive racism] too many brown people in London these days. In July he wrote an [Content Warning: Racism, anti-romanism] article comparing Roma communities (using a slur for them) to “wolves” that should be “shot”. His X account is also know to be “edgy” in a similar way. A few days ago he posted sort of a manifesto for his set of config files:

There’s even a longer version on the website. Even without a strong background in antifascist literature or history this reads like a fascist creed. About unity and identity. About “holding the line” (against codes of conduct and the rights of marginalized people as the website explains). About how there always needs to be a strong leader who makes the decisions. Given DHH’s other writing this is not a misguided joke, this is how he thinks about the world.

I began this text writing “Omarchy should not matter” but I have not explained why it does. It’s surely not about user numbers (it’s a clunky distro aimed at people who love to cosplay hackers). But it is about power.

DHH has used his connection to CEO’s of tech corporations and his position as influencer to collect up to now above 18 million dollars of funding for Omarchy. He uses that money not for himself (he has enough of that) but to fund certain pieces of Software he uses in his distribution. Like for example the window manager hyprland whose main developer the Omarchy money now funds. What is “Vaxry” known for outside of a niche window manager? He runs a community based around LGBTQ discrimination and participates in that (see the short summary on Drew DeVault’s “Weird Little Guys of FOSS” list). His bigotry is so consistent that he was banned from participating in the Freedesktop.org community where all the other developers of window managers and the free software desktop stack collaborate. And it was long before DHH funded him.

One could see a world where a CEO using his connections to drum up some funding for free software projects would be a good thing. But that’s not the world we live in I am afraid. DHH got 3 million USD from Digital Ocean (a cloud provider) for Omarchy. Basically at the same time where Digital Ocean cancelled their support of Flathub and GNOME that amounted to a value of 50 USD per month.

DHH is using his position and his influence to accumulate donations that he then can distribute to projects that align with his fascist worldview and ambitions. And in a time where many important projects and infrastructures are strapped for cash running just on the goodwill of a handful of people that is increasingly dangerous. Not because its corporate money – a lot of funding for open source comes from corporations, they are after all who are sucking up all the surplus from people’s labor. It’s because this amount of money gives him power.

The Omarchy foundation will be where projects in desperate need of funding will be pointed. And will a project focused on human rights and social justice get funding from our fascist overlord? What kind of pressure can that exert on projects who have to decide to either die due to lack of funding or kill their code of conduct?

An open fascist is building one of the bigger sources of funding for open source fully under his individual control and sucks up a lot of money that otherwise might have gone to liberatory projects. Community projects. Antifascist projects.

And that is why Omarchy matters. Sadly. Not because of its technical merit (even though those fascists love to use the “merit” argument to fight human rights) but because of its leader, his connections and his ability to accumulate financial power. Without anyone in that ecosystem saying anything about how that leader operates and talks. And you might know the saying: If there’s a Nazi and 10 folks sitting together at a table and nobody says and does anything? There’s 11 Nazis at that table.

Omarchy got a lot of recognition recently. Not only by corporate donors but by Youtubers and other tech influencers who kept praising it and nudged people (who might not know about DHH’s exploits) towards testing it. To become “a hardcore linux user/dev” or whatever other chauvinist argument they made. This makes it dangerous.

Running Omarchy means contributing to this dynamic. It means willingly integrating oneself into a fascist community. Legitimizing it. Supporting it. Omarchy is a fascist project that normalizes fascist thinking for everyone entering that community (even unknowingly). The baseline has to be not to use that system. And as people who believe in human rights and dignity, in community and a tech world that can be better we need to oppose Omarchy. Need to make sure it gets no seat at any table. Support projects who actively refuse to collaborate. Support projects who care about human rights and flourishing. And do not do business with the companies who willingly support fascists.

Siamo tutti antifascisti!

(Share this message about Omarchy [or some other similar post] around in the tech circles you frequent. Tell people about the background of this hyped Linux distribution and its fascist leader. Quit your 1password or Digital Ocean accounts and mention that it is because the support fascists.)

  • MrMobius @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Damn I knew some fascist movements were trying to take over the environmentalist scene but I wouldn’t have imagined fascists meddeling with open source.

  • regdog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Timeless quote:

    If there’s a Nazi and 10 folks sitting together at a table and nobody says and does anything? There’s 11 Nazis at that table.

        • jdr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t think there’s a special word for that.

          You might be saying that giving money to someone who says and does bad things is morally equivalent to saying and doing those bad things, but it doesn’t follow that you have the same beliefs or motivations.

          • Trioxin@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Let me put this in simple terms - if you give money to an organisation that successfully lobbies to ban gender affirming care, and then a trans person jumps off a bridge because they couldn’t get the care they need, as far as I am concerned, you pushed that person off the bridge.

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Before moving the goal posts, let’s stick with the original premise of the people at the table.

          So if that first person left, and someone else joins that table, is that person then also a nazi? Because by that logic, yeah - everyone is a nazi, you included.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 hours ago

            let’s stick with the original premise

            Buddy, the original premise of the article WAS donating to Nazis.

            • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              49 minutes ago

              Fair enough, I phrased that ambiguously.

              My issue was with the recursive definition of “nazi” - you are one if you associate with one or if you associate with someone who associate with one. That would mean petty much everyone alive, excluding some uncontacted tribes.

              To me, that kind of self-referential logic is utter bullshit. From what I can tell, David Hansson is absolutely a racist xenophobic piece of shit. But the actual nazis were way worse than that. And devaluing it to someone who n degrees away once had dinner with someone is utter insanity, and pissing on the graves of all that died in the second world war.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Wait what? I can distribute my setup on linux??”

    “Yeah”

    “LET’S FUCKING GOO WE CAN PRETEND IT’S A DISTRO AND MAKE CASH”

  • ejs@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i’m so incredibly annoyed by the fact that my previously favorite hosting provider digital ocean decided to fund this ridiculousness… any favorite alternatives anyone can offer?

  • HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I never thought an operating system would get milkshake-ducked. Literally, in the span of 24 hours, I went from:

    • 0h - Never heard of Omarchy
    • 12h - YouTube homepage flooded with dozens of videos about how cool Omarchy is
    • 24h - Omarchy is run by fascists.
    • stat_rosa@lemy.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      You and me both. I love Arch and I think Omarchy is great. Then I thought “let’s look this guy up…”. Unfortunately, he now has a bigger stage to spread his hate and it is very disturbing to see the companies who support him (they will claim they support the product, not the guy).

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Tech billionaires love funding bigots. See the entire far right in Europe. If they just have their discriminatory world view they’ll keep promoting if when then they grow. And if they stop funding dries up.

  • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    14 hours ago

    One thing I haven’t really figured out yet, and it may be because there isn’t an answer, is why some of these companies could plausibly be genuinely sending money to Omarchy.

    Like, Digital Ocean. They’re a headless server company. So… why are they donating anything to a desktop distro? There’s nothing Digital Oceany about Omarchy as far as I understand.

    It feels like someone was like “Guys, I made open source chicken feed” and Linode was like “son of a bitch I’m in”, I just don’t get it.

    Ignoring the part where they just like the vibes and want to spend their money on… favour? I don’t even know that the company pretends to get out of it… Like, how would one pitch this expense to shareholders? We use company money to fund projects we don’t use, that have nothing to do with our business, because the guy running the project we don’t use is mean to people who aren’t white enough for him? And that’s what we’re spending your money on?

    • orc girly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Private capital supported and bankrolled Hitler, Mussolini and plenty of other fascists, if you have the time and energy to read a book on it, Blackshirts and Reds explains this better and it’s fairly accessible!

    • chloroken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      “Gee, why would these corporations be into fascism? I’ve never read a book before.”

    • Majestic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well could be these companies are buying on fascism because they’re either run by fascists or being shaken down by fascists or their friends are fascists encouraging them to do this and they uncritically do so for some vague or not so vague promises. So it’s more a signal of obedience and doubling down on the move to open, naked reaction and taking over open source with fascism.

      That or its an intelligence op and the fascism is a bonus but the guy behind it is just pliable or a useful tool and there are larger plans to use this as a vehicle for influence to control open source, insert back-doors, push CIA coder guys into the right positions, steer in anti-China stuff to carve up the world of open source into strictly divided western and non-western code, remove openness and cooperation and militarize the space for American use.

      Either way not good as functionally this is a big money pot being created and centralized under reactionary control to bully open source into adopting reactionary politics and other not good things. Could be Linux is seen as increasingly a threat with the open spying on Microsoft driving enough of the public to Linux that corporations, governments, etc feel a need now to seize control of it.

  • obnomus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I read the wolf blog and yeah fucked up stuff. Idk what happens but if Linux projects profits from him idc, people need money to work, devs get money. It really subjective like if you’ll use a project that is funded by him.

  • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    IMO it’s the same situation as with POTUS45 and POTUS47 elections. Not talking about twisted facts and criminal behaviour would be to condone it and speaking out creates publicity.

    Word fascism got (intentionally)overloaded over the last decade and means very little to a lot of people, reducing it to equivalent of “jerk” rather than evoke memories and feelings towards atrocities of WWII etc. So we need a better language 'cause when we call someone fascist today many tune out.

    All of this is to say that I see nothing wrong with contents of the article but I suspect it has very little of desired effect due to the above. There must be a better way, but at the moment I do not know what is it.

    • dbdr@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Saying that certain ethnic minorities need to be shot (or deported) is a lot worse than just being a jerk and does evoke the atrocities of WWII.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      TL;DR: Omarchy is just a modified arch distro run by a fascism-loving millionaire and used to fundraise from people who don’t know better and funnel it away from general open source projects and towards open source projects of like-minded fascist sympathisers he knows or has come across.

  • CallMeAl (like Alan)@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or I can ignore Omarchy. I can continue to use and support the open source projects I like. I’ve been a happy linux and open source user for 25+ years. So far no asshole with money has been able to mess it up yet and I don’t see that changing. Many have tried.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s not you (an informed user) that they’re after, it’s about public perception of Linux.

      I would go as far as to say Omarchy is an attack on all Linux distros.

      It’s the notion that you can just “dial up some tech” that has been doing widespread harm to all branches of IT, shaking up the public trust in technology and confusing what “reliable” means for IT.

      If Omarchy succeeds in having AI create a usable Linux distro it would fundamentally alter the optics of “manually” created distros and the public’s trust in them. And it probably can, given massive amounts of money and resources. Hence all the millions being poured into it.

      It’s the old “embrace, extend, extinguish” strategy in a new form.

      • CallMeAl (like Alan)@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s the old “embrace, extend, extinguish” strategy in a new form.

        Do I need to point out that this has never worked against linux/open source?

        • lambisio@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Do I need to point out that this has never worked against linux/open source?

          Kindly point me to three generalist, widely known XMPP servers.

          • CallMeAl (like Alan)@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Kindly point me to three generalist, widely known XMPP servers.

            The lack of generalist widely known XMPP servers has nothing to do with the fact that today anyone who wants to deploy a modern up to date XMPP server can do so, and has choices. There are also modern actively maintained clients. That’s my point. There are also many general free servers to join, even if not well known.

            If you base the value of something on its popularity rather than its utility, then we aren’t concerned about the same things. As long as I can use the software I want to use in the way I want to use it, then I’m a happy user. I can’t control what other people use.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Not for lack of trying, mind you. Previous attempts were eventually thwarted after decade-long efforts, which is also how this one looks like it’s shaping up.

          It’s also worth pointing out that in previous cases there were champions of the industry that stood up for Linux and countered with equal amounts of money into things like lawsuits and marketing on the supporting side.

          Furthermore this attack is of the FUD variety (fear, uncertainty and doubt) which is harder to counter.

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      22 hours ago

      And if said asshole sponsors a project you use daily via the foundation, will you stop using the application?

      • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Mullvad’s founder decided he liked “keeping Sweden for the Swedes.” “We’ll trample the bodies, even the children if we have to.” That’s who he donated to (or funded you could say, being 72% of their funding and, in the words of the party leader, allowing them to finally field candidates.)

        I don’t use Mullvad anymore.

        Nice thing about open source is there’s usually many different options to choose from. Support them and they’ll grow. Plain as that.

      • CallMeAl (like Alan)@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Probably but I’d have to look into it and see for myself about the details. I’m not going to let some asshole burn down perfectly good open source just by giving money to it.

  • mmmm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    And as said in another post some days ago, I fear posts like this would cause a Streisand effect. Not cool to give them free publicity.

    • Luke@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Ignoring fascists and hoping they go away is one reason why fascism is having a resurgence right now. Immoral behavior should be challenged as widely and publicly as necessary to make everyone aware that it’s inappropriate. People don’t stop doing immoral things unless there are social consequences for it.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This is not really comparable to Streisand effect, because posts like these do not try to hide Omarchy. In fact this post is the opposite. People (posts like these) are concerned and want to discuss. We should let them. Do not mute yourself over topics that need to be addressed. I mean you personally can do, but don’t tell others not to post. Just my opinion.

      • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Agreed. This is not the Streisand effect. More like “no such thing as bad publicity” but there’s plenty of marketing going around that the red flag needs to be flown just to let people know what the real situation is.

    • squeeb@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 day ago

      Rather than the Streisand effect which is about attempts to censor information, its probably more accurately described by a term I recently learned about (coined by Lee Vinsel and popularised by Cory Doctorow in his various writings): ‘Criti-hype’.

      Doctorow uses it to describe how a lot of online AI criticism is actually feeding the so-called “growth story” that makes AI look attractive to investors (i.e., by tacitly accepting the narrative that AI is actually good enough to ‘take our jobs’, for example) which leads to greater and greater stock valuations of AI companies, and therefore continued AI bubble inflation.

      I see the parallels here, not sure if it’s 100% applicable, but thought I’d throw it out there

      • Feyd@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The deal with AI criti-hype is that the back of the card so-to-speak is praise, right?

        “The AI broke out and did some hacking (because it’s so powerful)” etc

        • Zarobi@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          In this case, the more we talk about how evil this distro is, the more evil people will find and support it. We were never going to install it in the first place.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      23 hours ago

      With the millions they’re pouring into it, any marketing eclipses any “Streisand effect”.

      • Jarmund@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Fucking Michael Dell is supporting this thing, that should tell you a lot. Fascists, the whole lot