Lochner Tech News
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 22 days ago

Are we just making up language rules as we go?

lemmy.world

message-square
79
link
fedilink
126

Are we just making up language rules as we go?

lemmy.world

The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to memes@lemmy.world · 22 days ago
message-square
79
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • EffortlessGrace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    Are we just making up language rules as we go?

    Yes, throughout history, in fact.

    And to answer the meme’s question it can have either definition based on the context of usage.

  • Orangenkuchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    Redminds of the German “umfahren” (run over) which is the exact opposit of “umfahren” (drive around). (First is pronounced with a tiny pause after the second letter; the other is not.)

    • Chaf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      Even better is “Haare wachsen lassen”. One meaning is letting your hair grow, the other is waxing your hair. Pronounced exactly the same

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 days ago

    Unlock-able versus un-lockable

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 days ago

      • Gork@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        Unlockable ass-lock

      • Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        XKCD #37

    • Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      That’s mental bracketing for you.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        TIL the thing I do when I’m trying to understand an ambiguous sentence has a name

  • WIZARD POPE💫@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    The issue is the fact that the opposite action of locking is called unlocking and not something like delocking.

  • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 days ago

    Sokath, his eyes uncoverable.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    Curse you! 🙃

  • Tacky4092@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    You are able to undo the locking. It’s almost like reading comprehension is shit nowadays.

    • MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      Why can it not mean unable to be locked?

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        Because people don’t generally use it that way and language changes and evolves based largely on how it is used.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 days ago

      un-lockable implies it is unable to be locked.

      unlock-able implies that it is able to be unlocked.

      It’s a homonym.

  • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    At the end, both are the same.

    You end up with something that isn’t locked.

    • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      I want my front door to be unlock-able, I don’t want it to be un-lockable.

    • MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      The first one isn’t locked unless you unlock it.

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    could be both

    maybe it’s a homonym

  • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Literally yes, we are.

    Cause language is a toolkit to communicate ideas, and a toolkit frozen in glass is a useless toolkit.

    You need to swap out that hammer when it starts getting damaged, or put back a screwdriver when you find out you need it again, or add new tools when you find that the tools you have now aren’t fit to purpose.

    And sure, there’s some loose screws at the bottom of the bag, but they don’t harm anything, and very occasionally they come in useful.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    Unconceivable.

    • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      You keep saying that word. I don’t think it means what you think it means.

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Why would unlockable mean able to be unlocked?

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 days ago

      unlock-able = able to be unlocked

      un-lockable = unable to be locked

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        Thank you. I feel dumb now lol

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          no need for that, language is weird

          • Billegh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            Contranyms are fun.

  • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Non-lockable feels like the right term.

    ‘Un-’ directly implies undoing, an action. ‘Non-’ implies a status, a non-possibility.

    That’s my two cents.

    • Billegh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Illockable

  • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

    Highly illockable

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 days ago

memes@lemmy.world

memes@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.world

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

  • !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
  • !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
  • !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
  • !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 504 users / week
  • 2.67K users / month
  • 2.69K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 22.4K subscribers
  • 232 Posts
  • 1.41K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world
  • The Picard Maneuver@startrek.website
  • BE: 0.19.20
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org