a man was charged with three felonies after he cut down a 3D-printed “decoy” Flock camera, which was set up by police.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s still a real physical object being intentionally broken by someone that doesn’t own it.

      Keep on mind, I’m absolutely NOT defending it, I’m just explaining the logic.

      • Amberskin@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        I understand, but the value of the destroyed ‘object’ is ridiculous so the penalty has to be minimal.

        Edit:

        Oh, and what if the ‘culprit’ just covers the fake camera?

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m guessing they are trying to work the “intent” angle. The person believed it was a real camera and intended to damage it. It’s the same way they can charge people over fake drugs.