• ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          It’s funny how even Microsoft themselves seem to forget ME ever existed.

          • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            There was a silver lining in that the backlash from ME being as terrible as it was is what finally convinced them to put the consumer editions on the NT kernel.

            • ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I’m not sure that’s how that happened. If memory serves, they were already working on xp at the time, but that started to slip the year 2000 deadline. So, in order to keep the OS revenue gravy train rolling, they quickly threw ME together to have something to release in the interim.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        In terms of Windows versions, yes, it was.

        It was objectively worse than XP, and deservedly short-lived. Win7 was objectively much better than Vista.

        People who survived from then to now, consciousness intact, even say that Win 98 was better than Vista.

        Not that I am endorsing Windows in any way.