Again with that? Fine, have it your way.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Like so much technology, it’s ruined by capitalism. Content algorithms could be amazing resources if what your algorithm thought you wanted was transparently displayed and easily edited.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

https://archive.ph/It6to

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

there are plenty of people who can

Do you have any scientific evidence to support this claim?

I don’t think it’s particularly good at all, but it does while away the hours sometimes

What model are you using?

I can’t see anyone who enjoys reading being enamored with AI.

Bold claim from someone who spends hours writing AI stories for themself. Then again, I guess I am assuming you consider yourself a person who enjoys reading.

My wife reads over 300 books per year, and she spots it pretty easily.

That’s over 5 books a week. I find if difficult to believe she’d notice if you slipped a book she read in January book into the list for this month, let alone an AI generated story. Still, that’s an impressive amount of books. My wife reads about 100 a year, but they’re almost all in her favorite genre, crime drama, and I am completely certain I could get a decent AI model to output a full length book in that genre and she wouldn’t notice. I’m not sure quantity of books read in a time frame really tells us much, either way, about the ability to detect AI generated writing.

As opposed to a single copy of a physical book?

First, I was discussing the hypothetical put forth by that other person.

Second, “hide it from the public” is almost certainly a function of copyright law. Just because you are allowed to digitize a book doesn’t mean you’re allowed to distribute it.