The GPL gives you the right to access and modify the source code of software you use. A lack of copyrights does not mean that the creators have to share the source code with you. In fact, it means that anyone can take GPL software and turn it into closed source software
When did Anthropic make Claude Code a separate subscription? I ask because it is still listed as part of the Pro subscription tier on their website. And because I haven’t seen the shit-storm that would no doubt ensue if they did that
I’ve been using “oldoldstable” as my cutoff for backwards compatibility in several pieces of software I’ve released. I guess I gotta decide if I start bumping dependencies now or if I wait for the Bookworm to become “oldoldstable” in 2027
None of the proposals would have banned AI usage in upstream projects, but banning AI usage in the context of the Debian project was on the table
What is the AI policy of Arch? I ask because I was unable to find any explicit policy for the project
None of the proposals would have banned AI usage in upstream projects:
But if you actually described this methodology in your PR, then it’d no doubt be closed immediately, based on the spirit of the rules rather than the exact letter of the rules.
Rules like these ultimately presuppose that the contributor is acting in good faith. Because otherwise the contributor could just lie about using an LLM. They don’t need to engage in rules-lawyering or jump through hoops to circumvent the rules
What is “Just. Wrong”? And what does the label “Linux boosted” have to do with this?