Alt. Profile @Th4tGuyII
Yeah, it would be nice to have an actual list so we’re not reliant on their numbers alone. But unfortunately telling only half the story is something Proton seems to do quite a lot.
On the bright side, the actual privacy data for this was by Proton’s own admission from Exodus, so while its probably not feasible for you to skim 65K apps on your own, you can at least see the data for specific VPN apps you might be worried about.
I mean it’s nice to have someone who actually knew Zuckerberg say the quiet part out-loud, but anyone who surprised to hear this must’ve been living under a rock for the last decade.
Corporations have never cared about the children. In other countries, the same corps that preach about caring for children have them working as slaves in factories. Don’t think for a second that they care.
In my eyes anyone wearing one of these is a pervert. I simply don’t see who else could be the audience for a purposefully discreet camera built into a pair of glasses. Even Google’s attempt at glasses were more overt that these. I’d say Meta is shameful, but that’s not exactly a shocker to anyone at this point.
Edit: Seen a few suggestions, but my counterpoint to all of them is - you don’t need the camera to discreet fir any of these purposes. You’d only need it to be discreet if you didn’t want people to realise you were filming, which just seems aimed towards perverts in my mind.
Turns out a putting decent safety-net at the bottom does more to help society than just praying for trickle-down economics to come into play any day now
Its funny how much the US bawks at even the tiniest of international accountability.
The US has put more action behind screwing over the ICC for trying to prosecute Israel over its literal war-crimes in the middle east and Genocide against Palestinians, than it has over the billionaire paedophile ring that occurred right under their noses.
Because how dare any other country or authority tell the US what it can and cannot do in the jurisdiction of said countries and authorities.
Well that’s a great incentive for clickbait content - cause now it won’t matter if you can keep people watching after you’ve reeled them in.
You’d think this would be against YouTube’s own best interest, considering they want to keep you watching, and people don’t often like watching that kind of clickbait-farm slop…
Or maybe I and the people I know are in the minority, and a lot of people just watch it whether they like it or not, which would be disappointing to hear.
Yeah true enough. Even if the data they’ve got was 100% accurate and easy to prove in court, they’d still be stuck having to pay out the arse for lawyers just to appear in court.