Not sure what you think will drain it all.

Our medical system + cost of living + retirement care + inflation + [everything else]

Bold of you to assume they’d limit themselves to merely forcing you to register on a list. Last go around, they used pink triangles.

Eh, Gen X told each other that sort of thing for years

Oh! So, the problem has been known about for decades and not fixed? Broken as the Epstein class intended and bribed the politicians to have happen.

Gen Y stands to be the benefactors of the largest wealth transfer in history, by the way. It won’t be equally distributed, but still.

You think something will pass like that? The Epstein class will have drained it all with the Boomers’ retirement/elderly care. The Millennials won’t get anything from their parents.

This was a custodial search by a police force, so civil procedure doesn’t apply.

Your linked source only applies to civil matters (think lawsuits for a slip and fall). It even says:

Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 37

That basically arises out of the Fifth Amendment, which reads:

No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

In the criminal conrext, the Fourth Amendment rules, which reads:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

All that “probable cause”, “stop and frisk”, and “reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing” stuff arises from the “unreasonable searches and seizures” bit.

Thank god for the Americans with Disabilities Act cause they’d already be doing it in the US if they could.

People have the rhetoric of turning to the ammo box since the other 3 don’t seem to work anymore, but there doesn’t seem to be much coming about from it. If the rhetoric isn’t actually materializing, then people must be consenting to having their rights taken away. In that case, the ballot box is delivering exactly what the people want.

So much so that you couldn’t be bothered to comment about it!

Being transgender is not a limitation of ability. It is an expression of authenticity.

Miranda came about in '66. You mention legislation that came about in '52. This means the explanation in Miranda would definitely contemplared and applied to that, especially since the Constitution outweighs legislation.

All settings means all settings

So, he’s literally admitting to ordering genocide?

See my comment here

CBP takes the position that travelers do not have the right to an attorney during questioning.

Literally untrue. They really need to look at Miranda v. Arizona, 484 U.S. 436, 467 (1965) (“there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege [to an attorney] is available . . . in all settings in which their freedom of action is curtailed in any significant way . . .”).

Probably Puerto Rico’s cities

*Edit:

No, but De Santis could.

I think any good prosecutor would know to use his official statements of record at sentencing.

Brittany Harpoons