Not exactly bulletproof, is it?

A successful detection result would indicate that Claude may have processed content. It would not prove that Claude was the original author, because users can submit human-created text, research, images, or files to Claude for summarizing, editing, translation, or proofreading.

Likewise, the absence of a watermark should not be treated as proof that a human wrote content. Older Claude models may not yet support marking, short text may contain too little material for reliable detection, and heavily edited output may lose its signal.

I think the first person was right. It’s probably just a pattern based on this part:

It may also survive certain edits. However, the company warned that extensive rewriting, paraphrasing, translation, or mixing the content with human-written material could weaken or remove the detectable signal.

I get people disliking corporate shill or scam accounts, but can we please not bring back the reddit thing where self promotion is universally shit on?

I looked at the app and this guy appears to be a small creator. I speak from experience when I say getting noticed as a small creator is really really hard.

If you don’t want to look at it, move on. Do we really need to shutdown someone down just for putting their work out there? 🫤