I don’t know that Flock cameras are using any depth-sensing hardware, so it stands to reason that they could be defeated with 2D projections.
One issue that you run into, however, is that these cameras are typically pointed at places where people are. That means that you’d have to be projecting these images onto places where people are going to be. This could be disorientating on pedestrian areas, and could be catastrophic on roadways.
It’s important to note that to produce an AI-generated image of somebody, they do not need to exist in the training data beforehand. You can use an image as a prompt, and an AI can create new works based on that prompt, without ever referencing the person from training materials.
Most of these CSAM files are not readily available on the clearnet, and I don’t think even Elon is stupid enough to let an AI scraper run free on Tor. One would have to go significantly out of their way to locate clearnet sources of CSAM to include into the training data.
Some would say it’s a distinction without difference, but I think it’s important to understand how these AI images are actually created, if you want to adequately legislate them.
The idea that CSAM is used in training data is largely discredited. An AI doesn’t need to have actual images of nude children to generate CSAM; it knows what humans look like naked, and it knows what children look like - it fills in the gaps from there.
It doesn’t ship with GrapheneOS.
Boomers have been voting for a century
Unless there is a statistically-significant amount of 118+ year old people actively voting, this is not possible.
It doesn’t. This is just adding more money to creators who reach certain tiers of engagement. This doesn’t make it any harder for new channels to earn.
The change that made it harder for new channels happened years ago, back in 2018 after the adpocalypse fallout when they increased the watch time requirements and removed a bunch of channels from YPP.
Or they just installed uBlock Origin Lite, which still works for most things.