I didn’t think they were distributing it correctly, no mention of the licence or source attribution

Hey he said binaries only, not the licence and source reference 😢

That’s interesting and distressing.

Maybe, I think guillotines can be impersonal, which might not elicit an appropriate level of emotional investment into any acts that are intended to be carried out.

Edit I broke the line of questions I’m so sorry

Yes, are you including extrajudicial consequences in your answer?

No! Will there be consequences?

The source of beige parenting, and the Benadryl challenge?

get stuck on “in-depth relationship mechanics” enough to

What about the profoundly mentally ill, who are projecting their own guilt from playing the Sims

Ghoulish

I’ve seen and used fixed length output on hashes, I assumed that is more common than variable length output.

I would not trust variable length output, and it looks like they screwed up their math enough that the function is reversible.

Wow they fucked that up so badly.

My understanding of hashing is a math function that reduces information.

The models and apparently that piece of software have retrievable information, so using that software to generate these images should count as reproduction under existing law.

You can’t reproduce an approximation from any type of hash, so that argument is dead in the water.

Do you understand what I mean by stenographically embedded?

I think there’s no real change that needs to be made to the law. The images are stenographically embedded into these models. There exists some generic input data that results in the reproduction of the embedded data.

This is not really any different than a password protected zip file.

Wdym some people like being terrorized by the stasi/s

A biped car would be so easy to parallel park

that’s too many stairs

Basically sums up all the reactions to any increase in popularity of any open/foss project 🤷🏻‍♂️

Hehehe

Am I an idiot for soft boiling an egg for ramen in the same kettle as the water for the ramen?