• BladeFederation@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m playing thr first one right now.

    It does not fuck around. This really surprised me, given how cutesy/wholesome it is.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’ve noticed it’s a good method for Japanese writing. They acclimate you to silly, bashful moments, so that when the writing flexes over to the serious side, it’s a big contrast. Yakuza does a lot of that too.

      Comparatively, sometimes when I try series like The Last of Us, or even Nier Automata, I sometimes have a hard time buying into the emotions because it’s been solely despair for a lot of the runtime.

      That said, as I’ve gotten used to my own creative writing, I see Sky as having tremendous up-moments that give characters some really star moments, but also quite a lot of narmy, amateurish teenage writing especially with the fights, so it gets to be hit and miss.

      • BladeFederation@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        To be clear, I’m fine with the wholesomeness, it was what I was in the mood for. I was more referring to the difficulty having crazy spikes, especially in the beginning. You’d expect a game like this to trend easy-ish. Never thought a cute catlike furball intro boss that is eating a farmer’s crops would be a near insurmountable wall.

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I played the original trails in the sky trilogy, should I play this? Is it largely the same story?

    • Poopfeast420@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same story, different localisation, so minimal differences.

      You get modern graphics and QoL changes and stuff.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Me, I’m gonna skip, not because I expect they did a bad job; the cinematic direction of the first game’s ending was definitely well achieved. I just recognize there’s a lot to play right now, and the time investment for a large JRPG doesn’t fit in my busy world.

      I may end up watching reaction videos of the remakes of key emotional scenes though. A part of me is always going to be nitpicking preferences of the original, perhaps unfairly.

    • emb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The one review I read said it’s kinda worth it:

      I even picked up on things I hadn’t realized would become more important later on through this playthrough, such as the Reinford Company name-dropping or the references to Crossbell’s political situation at this narrative juncture. Replaying the story was a great refresher for me, too! It allowed me to appreciate just how much detail Falcom poured into the overall Trails narrative.

      Can you enjoy this remake if you’ve already played through SC? I can wholeheartedly say yes, as replaying the story again illuminated some plot points for me in ways I hadn’t expected. From a storytelling standpoint, even the remake’s 3D graphics and voice acting help present key story reveals, shedding additional light on things.

      Source: https://www.rpgfan.com/review/trails-in-the-sky-2nd-chapter/

      Tho for my part, I struggle to say I’d want to spend dozens of hours replaying most story-focused JRPGs. I could imagine considering it only with my handful of favorites.