inari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoAI’s recursive self-improvement might not come so quickly after allwww.technologyreview.comexternal-linkmessage-square51linkfedilinkarrow-up1148
arrow-up1148external-linkAI’s recursive self-improvement might not come so quickly after allwww.technologyreview.cominari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square51linkfedilink
minus-squarepcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.frlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoMmmh… They used Opus 4.8 (which is already outdated) as the model, and OpenClaw (which is utter garbage) as the harness…
minus-squareleanleft@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoheavy criticism of openclaw seems to be the consensus. recently, model makers have all been overly obssesed with toolcalling models. i expect that aspect to be improving the fastest.
Mmmh… They used Opus 4.8 (which is already outdated) as the model, and OpenClaw (which is utter garbage) as the harness…
heavy criticism of openclaw seems to be the consensus. recently, model makers have all been overly obssesed with toolcalling models. i expect that aspect to be improving the fastest.