I don’t get the argument that you can’t own your games you have
That’s not what the lawsuit is about. It’s about whether or not Sony is clearly disclosing to California residents that Sony is selling a licence to play a game and not “unrestricted ownership”.
Sony is saying it’s clear they are selling licences. As you said, you’d assume breaking ToS gets you banned. That means you assume your purchase comes with restrictions. That’s exactly Sony’s argument. They don’t need a flashing sign on their store page telling you the purchase comes with access and usage restrictions because you already know it does.
That’s not what the lawsuit is about. It’s about whether or not Sony is clearly disclosing to California residents that Sony is selling a licence to play a game and not “unrestricted ownership”.
Sony is saying it’s clear they are selling licences. As you said, you’d assume breaking ToS gets you banned. That means you assume your purchase comes with restrictions. That’s exactly Sony’s argument. They don’t need a flashing sign on their store page telling you the purchase comes with access and usage restrictions because you already know it does.