I really doubt that. It depends a bit on which country you’re talking about, even if a court rules that way, there is way too much money involved for the Supreme Court to uphold it. And even in the very unlikely event the supreme court would do that, I’d imagine this would be one of these rare moments of bipartisanship where some kind of way is found to allow for AI generated code. The US isn’t willing to lose the ‘AI race’ due to principles, ethics or law.
The documents I quote are from publications by the U.S. Copyright Office. But, the Berne convention and the WTO ensure that member states copyrights are aligned.
I doubt “allow for AI generated code” has the bipartisan support you think it does; it certainly doesn’t have the popular support. But, ever if it were legal, it should still be unethical (e.g. Amnesty International’s reports of human rights violations in generative AI), and I’d be attempting to avoid it.
I really doubt that. It depends a bit on which country you’re talking about, even if a court rules that way, there is way too much money involved for the Supreme Court to uphold it. And even in the very unlikely event the supreme court would do that, I’d imagine this would be one of these rare moments of bipartisanship where some kind of way is found to allow for AI generated code. The US isn’t willing to lose the ‘AI race’ due to principles, ethics or law.
The documents I quote are from publications by the U.S. Copyright Office. But, the Berne convention and the WTO ensure that member states copyrights are aligned.
I doubt “allow for AI generated code” has the bipartisan support you think it does; it certainly doesn’t have the popular support. But, ever if it were legal, it should still be unethical (e.g. Amnesty International’s reports of human rights violations in generative AI), and I’d be attempting to avoid it.