Wyoming’s “Stand Your Ground” law says you don’t have to run from a confrontation before defending yourself. That is what Rihanna Kelver and her counsel are asking a Laramie judge to consider as they seek protection from prosecution in a felony case stemming from a confrontation outside the Crowbar.

  • meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Not in the legal sense those words are used. In a “duty to retreat” state you must attempt to retreat if one is available and reasonable before you can attempt to defend yourself. That means you can’t back pedal and shoot someone.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There’s no duty to retreat in Wyoming. The problem is she approached them after they insulted her, which isn’t protected by Stand Your Ground.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        And her version she claims she was trying to understand what they were saying. It’s perfectly reasonable if someone is obviously yelling something towards you and you can’t understand it that you get closer. Closing the distance to talk to someone isn’t being the initial aggressor. If this goes to trial, that will be something for a jury to decide. We don’t really get to do that here.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Her version also claims she pulled a non-existent knife instead of a gun. She hasn’t done her credibility any favors here. Witnesses say she approached with her hand at her hip as if she was ready to draw a gun.

          If true, that shows that she felt like she was in danger as she approached. That’s not covered by SYG.

          This is by no means a cut and dry case of clear self defense.

          • meco03211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yet here you are trying to argue a cut and dry case the other way. That’s for a jury if it goes to trial.