• searabbit@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    I only skimmed the article, but I’m familiar with this area of work. It’s the fine tuning phase of llms that require human “graders” in a sense to tell the model what is a helpful vs unhelpful response and elevate it from a literal autocomplete tool to a chatbot. The biggest platform for this kind of work is DataAnnotation if you want to look it up. It’s not just random people in the global south but also professionals training the model on their niche expertise (e.g., lawyers, accountants, engineers). The other type of work that has been going on even pre-llm chatbot era is, as you said, moderation. You moderate the chatbot for “bad” answers, correct them, and often that means impersonating the bot to the end user. I believe this is the main driver behind llm progress lately; literally humans teaching AI how to appear more human.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s funny because what’s human can change from culture to culture. Still globalization has been changing that… Making a more universal culture via the Internet.