Members of Congress are being urged to investigate President Donald Trump’s plan to import hundreds of thousands of metric tons of foreign beef in a bid to lower grocery store costs, amid growing frustration from farm-state lawmakers and the nation’s embattled ranchers at the proposal.
Under the plan, the administration would allow up to 300,000 metric tons of lean beef trimmings into the U.S. tariff-free from a still-unspecified source country for a 90-day period beginning September 1—which Trump said would then be sold “at 25 percent below current market prices."
“Congress needs to have an emergency hearing on this,” John Boyd, founder and president of the National Black Farmers Association, said in response to the proposal, which the president said would “reduce prices for Americans while giving space for our Great American Beef Herd to grow again.”



Those side effects are all for intravenous administration, not ingestion.
And before you handwave it away remember that the difference between “life giving beverage” and “drowning” is in how water is administered.
More detail on side effects below. Note the bolded sentence in the first paragraph. If a fatal side effect can occur from topical use, do you really think it’s safe to eat?
There’s a reason it’s been banned since the 90s for use in livestock, and the reason is BECAUSE IT CAN KILL PEOPLE if not administered by a medical professional.
My question to you is why would you try to minimize the risk? Do you want people to get sick and die?
Again - topical use is not ingestion. And this is a case where dose matters as well. The amount you would ingest from meat that has been cooked is going to be very different from the amount you would be applying topically as a medicine.
That’s you’re reading - not my meaning. You don’t get a pass on “factually correct” just because your inaccuracy supports a conclusion you like.
It is your meaning and purpose if you’re minimizing a fatal risk, one that every western country, including fucking ARGENTINA where this toxic beef comes from, has laws against.
FOR 30 FUCKING YEARS.
Do you really think you’re smarter than the scientific community’s consensus for 30 yeas? When someone takes your shitty advice, and dies because of a bad reaction, will you realize what you’re saying then?
Hell, would you eat a burger with this crap in it?
Take some goddamn responsibility for your words or STFU.
And I’m not. I’m saying the data you provided to back up that assertion is wrong and/or bad.
No - I’m saying the data you’ve provided to back up that assertion is wrong and/or bad.
I’m not saying anything like that. I’m saying the data you’ve provided to back up that assertion is wrong and/or bad.
Same to you.