politics @lemmy.world · 3 days ago

Mamdani favorability rating climbs to 69%

www.usatoday.com

185

939

Mamdani favorability rating climbs to 69%

www.usatoday.com

yonderbarn@lazysoci.al to

politics @lemmy.world · 3 days ago

185

Mayor Mamdani finds favor in New York City, but struggles with state

www.usatoday.com

In a Siena poll, released Aug. 12, 811 likely New York voters were surveyed on many politicians in the state, including Mamdani. Here's what to know.

In June, he was at 58%.

Chat

mycodesucks@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
arrow-up
24·
3 days ago
Nice
- TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip
  link
  fedilink
  arrow-up
  23·
  3 days ago
  Nice
  - Kettrick@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23·
    3 days ago
    Nice
    - FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22·
      3 days ago
      Nice
      - onyxjet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23·
        3 days ago
        Nice
        
        davetortoise@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16·
        3 days ago
        Nice
        
        51dusty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14·
        3 days ago
        nice
        
        wanderinglurk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8·
        3 days ago
        Nice
        
        wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8·
        3 days ago
        Nice
- Svengarlic @lemmy.world
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  2·
  2 days ago
  Nice

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News