• DarkwingDuck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    So what? Yes, that’s what the paper note is for. If someone wants to get unauthorized access, they will likely try it and wipe the phone. You have zero obligation to warn them not to do that. You didn’t authorize access.

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think you’re on the right track. You could say the note was for cell phone thieves or something and you didn’t expect the police to use it. Plausible deniability.

      • DarkwingDuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Even if you did expect the police to use it, you aren’t obligated to front that information to them. Anything you say or do may be used in against you in the court of law. So, the safe option is to say and do nothing at all, let them dig their own grave.

        • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’m talking about in the court of law, when they’re claiming you tampered with evidence by leaving the note. Your lawyer could tell the jury that there were many reasons someone might have a note with a pin that erases the phone, including theft. Their client (you) invoked their right to silence, and you had no obligation to prevent the police from erasing your phone.