• Ingwerperium@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    China does not claim to be a fully communist society yet. Official ideology describes the country as being in a long-term developmental phase of socialism; communism is portrayed as a future goal. However, if they continue as they have been treating people like mere numbers, keeping them in poverty under total control, while billionaires amass wealth they will never achieve that anyway. In a society that ideologically advocates for overcoming class distinctions and capitalist exploitation, enormous private fortunes exist. Entrepreneurs like Jack Ma have at times amassed wealth running into the billions. At the same time, the Party controls key sectors of the economy and can exert massive pressure on companies. That transitional phase has gone spectacularly wrong. That is not how communism is defined. Private property is accepted only as long as it remains compatible with the Party’s political interests. This is very convenient for the government: it can harness the productivity and innovation of capitalism without adopting the political power structures of a liberal political system.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    IMHO China is a more capitalist country than the USA. 12h workdays 6 days a week (996), with overtime 16h, no labour rights, no representation, only the party gets that. Flooding the markets with goods sold at a loss, to drive the other countries’ industry out of business. The taxpayer subsideses the loss. And once China is the monopoly, they can charge what they want.

    IMO these MAGA cunts should wet themselves at the sight of China. After all, China is more capitalist than the USA, lol.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      IMHO China is a more capitalist country than the USA. 12h workdays 6 days a week

      Communism doesn’t mean that everybody can slack off. If people don’t work enough it’s difficult for them to catch up with Capitalism, like USSR and Eastern Europe have shown.

      All that work has paid off for China. Unlike any other country they have a shot at being independent from the West.

      Capitalism means that the people who control the means of production also control politics. That’s not true in China, so that people there can hope for a better life despite AI and robots.

  • Leviathan@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    Tankies are the greatest right-wing propaganda that lefties still fall for both by believing in it and by believing that it’s actually coming from sincere leftists.

  • bjc@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    i have it on good authority from about half of lemmy that china is a wonderful place where everyone feels safe and actually there never were any uyghurs, since that’s just western propaganda

    • liuther9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Why people like china? They are trying to solve global warming problem. They are bringing innovations at scale and low cost. Their state is battling some capitalism schemes, like price inflation of goods and housing. Their billionares are little bitches of the party. Not the other way around. People there generally feel safe, better salaries compared to its neighbours, better medicine etc.

      If usa or europe or russia rules the world, humanity is fuked. If china rules then everything will be fine.

      • wraekscadu@vargar.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Wdym? Haven’t you seen the citizens of the democratic people’s republic of Korea cheer and cry when they see their beloved leader Kim Jong Un?

        Also, did you know that countless people defect from South Korea to the democratic people’s republic of Korea???

        /s

        The second point is legitimately what someone told me on lemmygrad. No, they explicitly said “today”. They were not just talking about the 50s-60s.

  • Racoonwithbenefits@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    China is a capitalist country

    They focus their government money on creating jobs and control. People will well paying jobs and money for fun stuff are less likely to start a civil war

    Rather than the US where the focus is making themselves richer and funding the military

    • Funding the military so they can quash any rebellions from people having nothing left to lose deciding to rise up. Did you know that the founding fathers intended for there to be no standing army for this very reason? I just learned this the other day.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    They didn’t used to have billionaires, when Mao was in power. Strangely, a lot of Westerners seem to hate what China is now, but also hate what China was before, which seems very strange to me. “The reforms were bad and China should be more Maoist” that is a coherent position, “The reforms were good but should have gone further and become even more capitalist” that is also a coherent position. But “China is bad now because they allow billionaires but they were also bad when they didn’t allow billionaires” isn’t really coherent, it just seems like knee-jerk opposition to whatever they do or don’t do. Anyone who wants to offer critiques should be able to answer the simple question of whether the reforms were good or bad, whether they moved in the right or wrong direction.

    On the off-chance that you actually want a serious answer to the question, let’s start with some history. Before the revolution, China’s average life expectancy was in the 30’s, it experienced frequent famines, had no access to medicine, and had had similarly awful conditions for literally thousands of years with no improvement for the average person. The revolution brought about huge improvements in life expectancy and the basic necessities of life (with the failure of the Great Leap Forward being an exception to this general trend).

    However, while central planning works for providing basic necessities because the demand for those necessities is very predictable, it is not the most efficient regarding consumer goods. This was one of the failures that caused the collapse of the USSR, the desire for consumer good and the inability to compete domestically. Furthermore, despite the increases in life expectancy, virtually everyone in China still lived in extreme poverty. The reforms in the 80s were intended to address this, and they were wildly successful at it:

    In the words of Deng, it doesn’t matter if the cat is white or black, so long as it catches mice. It doesn’t really matter if a policy is ideologically “pure,” so long as it provides clear material benefits for the common people.

    Where I’m standing, the whole point of having any sort of political beliefs at all is to figure out which policies will improve people’s lives. And lifting 800 million people out of extreme poverty over the span of 40 years, can you name a more successful policy, ever, in all of history?

    • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I think the position of those people is “Maoism was bad, the reforms were good, but they overcorrected”. Imho a perfectly coherent position as well. Quality of life in modern China is surely better than during the Mao era, and not only because if material wealth, but surely this current state is not perfect. Far from it, if you ask me.

  • Oppopity@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Because they’re marxist leninist and think socialism is something you work towards and isn’t achievable by pressing the big red communism button.

  • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    China has stopped being communist for a while now, it’s developed into some flavour of capitalist society though I don’t remember much about the different variants. It’s certainly top heavy though like the USA.

  • TheLunatickle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    They aren’t trying to be communist, they are trying to be “Communist with Chinese elements” which is just capitalism. Similar to how they are a “Democracy with Chinese elements” which is just a dictatorship.

    • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      Well yeah, he criticized a government labeled “communist”. He’s lucky to be alive. But, he’s still a billionaire and has homes in half a dozen countries.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        I’m just trying to connect your reasoning here. Are you implying that billionaires should be brought to heel by popular power or private property should be respected? Do you believe property is an essential right that should give you a megaphone or not? I’m just saying billionaires don’t particularly laugh at Chinese state directives as in the meme.