• db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    Redundancy would have made this a non issue. Even just local cold storage.

    • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      50 TB isn’t even that much space, certainly not for a broadcaster. No reason not to have a local copy. 50 PB, I could see a small PBS affiliate not having the resources to manage locally, but you can put 50 TB in consumer-grade NAS.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s less storage than my Plex storage. PBS could and should definitely do better.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 days ago

          More specifically, this PBS affiliate (Nine PBS St Louis). It wasn’t PBS proper. This only impacted local programming archives. But that’s still a loss for the local community.

          PBS likely does much better than this. Heck, a lot of their stuff is backed up in the Library of Congress.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        Refurbished Exos X22 drives with 24GB Capacity cost around 650€ these days, those 2k are the high end even nowadays.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Refurbished

          If you’re a multi-billion dollar broadcast parent company doing long term storage for a 70-year archive catalog, you can spring for new. Maybe even go Big Fancy and get some RAID drives and tape backups, for extra redundancy.